sub-indicators consisting of respect, empathy, being listened to or understood, openness,
and humility possessed by communicators or extension workers.
The results of this study are in line with Rasyid, (2012) in extension activities for
farmers carried out using a system of training and visits. The visit was carried out at the
secretariat of the group and gapoktan or rice fields owned by farmers and asked what
problems were faced by farmers, but not all problems could be solved at the location. This
system of exercises and visits is carried out three times a week.
Sadono, (2009) as communication between people face-to-face, which allows each
participant to capture the reactions of others directly, both verbally and nonverbally. Such
communication indicates that the communicating parties are in close proximity, sending and
receiving messages both verbal and nonverbal simultaneously and spontaneously.
2. The Effect of Group Communication on the Adoption Rate of Postharvest Technology
Innovation in Rice Rice Fields
Indicators of group communication variables associated with the level of adoption of
postharvest technology innovations are: (1) group discussion, and (2) group effectiveness.
Nurdin et al., (2013) states group communication as face-to-face interaction between three
or more people, with better known goals, such as sharing information, taking care of
themselves, problem solving, whose members can remember the personal characteristics of
other members precisely. Group communication is a very important method of counseling
because it produces opportunities to influence the behavior of its participants.
The results of statistical calculations show that the communicator regression
coefficient of 0.510 with Sig at 0.038 shows a significant influence on the communicant
variable. This result proves that the higher group communication shown from group
communication indicators, among others: (1) group discussion, (2) group effectiveness. In
the group discussion indicator, there are sub-indicators consisting of increasing knowledge,
changing attitudes and changing behavior, in the sub-indicators of increasing knowledge,
group discussions can help members integrate knowledge by providing opportunities to ask
questions, connect new information with what is already known. In the sub-indicators of
attitude change, creating awareness of problems, problem formulation, changes in norms,
and opinion formation. In sub-indicators of behavior change such as individual decision
making, collective decision making, choice making, conformity, social facilitation that
shows smooth work quality, and polarization.
In the group effectiveness indicator, there are sub-indicators of situational factors of
group characteristics such as group size, communication networks, group cohesion and
leadership, and group personal factors consisting of interpersonal needs, communication
actions and roles. In this case the farmer says the members of the group work together to
carry out the task of the group and maintain the morale of its members, besides that the
purpose of the group is to share information with each other.
This result is in line with the results of research conducted by Cahyanto & Sugihen,
(2008) which revealed that group communication is more effective than other
communications because farmers are guided and directed in groups to carry out more
productive activities on the basis of cooperation. Group communication is more beneficial
because it allows for feedback and group interaction that provides opportunities to exchange
experiences and influence on its members. In this method, organizing in extension activities
is directed at accelerating technology distribution at each level of the target of development.
And B. Curtis, James J. Floyd, and Jerril L. Winsor (2005) in (S. Suryanto & Safrizal,
(2015) stated that group communication occurs when three or more people meet face-to-